The Buzz

All markets and investing news all the time

Google's 'evil' stock split

April 1, 2014: 12:38 PM ET
darth-vader-google-614xa

Remember when Google was a rebel? The company's stock split shows its transition to tech's dark side may be complete.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

It's been almost 10 years since Google famously told the world in its filing for an initial public offering that "don't be evil" was a guiding principle for the company.

But Google is about to issue new shares to existing investors which have absolutely no voting rights. Isn't that sorta evil?

If you owned Google (GOOG) as of March 27, you will wind up with twice as many shares at half the price when the markets open on April 3. The old Google Class A shares will trade under the new ticker symbol of GOOGL. That comes with the right to a vote at the annual shareholder meeting.

The new Class C Google shares will trade under the old ticker symbol of GOOG. They have no vote. So while the value of your investment will not change, your say over how Google runs the company will.

Related: As Gmail turns 10, a look back at how Google came to dominate e-mail

Why is Google doing this? To further consolidate power among the Google leadership triumvirate of CEO Larry Page, chairman Eric Schmidt and co-founder Sergey Brin.

Keep in mind those three already control more than 61% of the voting power for Google because they are the largest owners of Class B shares. Those shares are not listed publicly ... and they have 10 votes per share compared to one vote for the Class A shares.

Cue the Imperial Death March theme from the original Star Wars trilogy. (I'm pretending Episodes 1 through 3 don't exist.)

Even before this stock split, Google was viewed by some as the New York Yankees of tech stocks: the proverbial Evil Empire. This move is the equivalent of making the Death Star fully operational. (Watch out, Alderaan!)

R4dNiC

As the company explained/spun when they first announced the proposal for the split nearly two years ago, the new share structure was "designed to preserve the corporate structure that has allowed Google to remain focused on the long term."

Translation: Nobody else really matters when it comes to decision making. We might as well be a private company.

Unsurprisingly, some shareholders were not pleased with the proposal. The fact that it has taken this long for the split to go into effect is because some shareholders sued to block it.

Google settled with that group last June. Google agreed to stricter board reviews of some acquisitions using company stock and also agreed to compensate shareholders if the new C shares begin to trade at a discount to the A shares with voting rights. And I think that is exactly what should and will happen. But more about that in a bit.

Related: Google and Facebook are in a tech cold war

Google is not the only company to play this game. Many media firms, particularly family-run ones, also have two shares of stock. That's the case for Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. -- (NWS), (NWSA) -- and Twenty-First Century Fox -- (FOX), (FOXA). Ditto for Sumner Redstone's CBS -- (CBS), (CBSA) and Viacom -- (VIA), (VIAB).

And cable giant Comcast has three classes of shares like Google. Two trade publicly: (CMCSA) and (CMCSK). The shares with a symbol ending in A have a vote. The ones with the not-so-special K do not. Comcast's Class B shares are held by a company controlled by CEO Brian Roberts -- whose father, Ralph, founded Comcast.

So why am I making such a fuss of this? Google is supposed to be different than the rest of the tech sector. This is a firm that started as a plucky David going up against the Goliath of Microsoft (MSFT). Google now is worth more than Microsoft. It's no longer fighting "The Man." It is "The Man."

The point of owning a stock is that you don't just profit from the company's success. You also have a say -- albeit small -- in how it is run. Google is throwing that out the window. Ironically, the company that owns YouTube is saying that "You" don't matter.

The notion that Google shareholders have any real rights is a Woody Allen-esque travesty of a mockery of a sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a sham. The company wants you to blindly put its faith in Page, Brin and Schmidt and hope for the best.

To be fair, Google shareholders have been rewarded handsomely by that trio so far. Google's stock is up more than 40% in the past year and has surged 220% in the past five years.

And if you were lucky enough to own Google since it went public, you might want to name your sons (or daughters, I'm not judging) after Larry, Sergey or Eric. Google's stock is up an astonishing 1,235% from its IPO price of $85.

Still, isn't it reckless for an investor to throw caution completely to the wind and trust that Page, Brin and Schmidt will never make a mistake? The tech sector is full of companies that were once leaders who failed to adapt to changing times.

Luckily, Google has not made any notable blunders -- well, none that had a lasting impact on the stock. It is a forward-looking company that doesn't worry as much about what Wall Street and short-term oriented traders think about the company.

So while I wouldn't necessarily advise investors to drop Google -- it is, after all, a phenomenal company -- no investor in their right mind should ever buy the new class C shares.

In fact, if I were an existing Google investor, I'd sell the Class C shares I receive in order to buy more A shares. That way, my vote would still count as much in the future.

  • Twitter may be the next MySpace

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

    Maybe Ellen DeGeneres broke Twitter after all?

    I'm being glib (that's for you Tom Cruise and Matt Lauer!) of course. The fact that shares of Twitter (TWTR) are down more than 15% since the selfie seen MORE

    - Mar 27, 2014 1:29 PM ET
  • Tesla tops Google in March Stock Mania

    Elon Musk made his mother proud Monday.

    The tech mogul's electric car company, Tesla Motors (TSLA), narrowly beat out Google (GOOG) in CNNMoney's fourth annual March Stock Mania contest. In the final round, Tesla took home 52% of the vote in this year's competition, compared with 48% for last year's champ.

    The victory did not go unnoticed. After CNNMoney's Paul R. La Monica posted the news on Twitter early Monday, Musk's mother, MORE

    - Mar 24, 2014 12:00 PM ET
  • 5 questions Twitter must answer

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

    It's put up or shut up time for Twitter! The company will release its first "earnings" report since its initial public offering after Wednesday's closing bell.

    Considering shares of Twitter (TWTR) are up about 150% from MORE

    - Feb 4, 2014 1:32 PM ET
  • Microsoft CEO should be ...

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

    Microsoft is still searching for a new CEO to replace Steve Ballmer. But I have a suggestion. Hire Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen.

    I'm a bit surprised that Narayen's name hasn't been mentioned at all.

    For one, Adobe MORE

    - Jan 23, 2014 2:08 PM ET
  • Apple must fight back against Google

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

    Google has stolen all of Apple's thunder and Apple needs to try and reclaim some of it.

    During the past few years, Google (GOOG) has become the most innovative company in the tech industry. It has MORE

    - Jan 14, 2014 12:29 PM ET
  • The 2013 Nasdaq is nothing like 2000

    It's been a banner year for stocks. The Dow and S&P 500 have been in record territory since March, while the Nasdaq has been trading at its highest levels since 2000.

    Though the robust gains have ignited some worries that stocks may be overvalued, most experts believe that a dose of skepticism is actually healthy and predict that stocks will continue to rise next year, albeit at a more MORE

    - Dec 22, 2013 9:00 AM ET
  • BlackBerry: Not dead yet! Seriously

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

    BlackBerry, the smartphone maker formerly known as (Prince?) Research in Motion, is having a terrible 2013.

    Okay. I'm sugarcoating the situation by merely referring to this year as terrible. It's been horrific. Deplorable. Ghastly. MORE

    - Dec 10, 2013 4:04 PM ET
  • Will Google soon pass Exxon in market value?

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

    Google's CEO wasn't the subject of an Academy Award-nominated movie. Google's CEO also didn't strike a pose for Vogue. (Thank goodness for that!)

    Larry Page seems like a pretty boring guy. I've listened to many Google MORE

    - Nov 26, 2013 1:01 PM ET
  • I was wrong about Facebook

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

    Blech. I'm not looking forward to dining on a small, black bird. But here goes.

    It's time to eat some crow. I wrote a column about four months ago about Facebook's stock. It was called Facebook MORE

    - Sep 24, 2013 1:19 PM ET
Fear & Greed
Sponsored by

To view my watchlist

Not a member yet?

Sign up now for a free account
Stupid Stock Move of the Day
#StupidStock Move of the Day! Yes. Before 10. $CSCO up on buy rating? Sure, it's safe dividend tech. But isn't Heartbleed router news bad?
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.