The Buzz

All markets and investing news all the time

Will 7 Apples a day keep the bears away?

April 24, 2014: 1:49 PM ET
Apple investors will soon get 7 shares for each one they currently own. Will the split get the stock out of its long funk?

Apple investors will soon get 7 shares for each one they currently own. Will the split get the stock out of its long funk?

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

In just a few months, shares of Apple will cost a lot less for the average investor than they do right now. But the stock will not be cheaper.

Apple (AAPL) announced on Wednesday that it is splitting its stock 7 for 1 at the start of June. That means that if you own one share of Apple right now that trades at about $564, you'll wind up with 7 Apple shares fetching about $80.57 a piece following the split. Apple is simply flooding the market with more shares at a lower price.

The size of your investment does not change. The split means nothing for Apple's earnings or revenue and doesn't impact its balance sheet.

And the market value of Apple (like the titular song in Led Zeppelin's first track off of "Houses of the Holy") remains the same as well.

Apple CEO Tim Cook even pooh-poohed the idea of a split a few years ago.

Related: Tim Cook said a stock split 'does nothing' back in 2012

But the stock split, coupled with some other good news from Apple's most recent earnings report, might actually be good news. Shares of Apple surged 8% Thursday as the company said that profits and sales beat analysts' forecasts. Apple also increased the size of its share buyback program.

(For the record, I still think Apple is one of seven lucky tech stock bargains that should hold up well even the Nasdaq continues to convulse like it did a few weeks ago.)

Still, why would a move that artificially pushes the price lower be something to cheer? Isn't it just a case of financial engineering?

Yes. But stock splits do often send an important psychological message.

It could be a sign that the company wants more so-called "retail" investors (a bit of jargon for market aficionados who are not in the 1%) to be able to buy shares.

Related: Check out Apple and other influential tech stocks in CNNMoney's Tech 30

This isn't the first time Apple split its stock. The last time it did so was in February 2005. That was a mere 2 for 1 split. And it knocked the price down from the mid-high $80s range to the low-mid $40s. Apple's stock clearly continued to do well after that.

In fact, there are numerous academic studies that show that shares of companies that announce stock splits tend to outperform non-splitters over the next several years.

(If you're interested, here are two noteworthy ones in from the mid-late 1990s co-authored by financial professor David Ikenberry: "What Do Stock Splits Really Signal?" and "Underreaction to Self-Selected News Events: The Case of Stock Splits." Ikenberry, who was a professor at Rice University at the time and is now dean of the Leeds School of Business at the University of Colorado Boulder, has studied this topic extensively.)

And there are numerous recent examples of other companies with sticker shock stock prices that have done well after they lowered their stock prices via splits.

Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA) famously trades at a six-figure stock price. That's not something us mere mortals can buy. And the Berkshire B shares also used to trade at a lofty price before the company finally decided to split that stock 50 for 1 in 2010 following Berkshire's acquisition of railroad Burlington Northern Santa Fe.

Berkshire B shares (BRKB) were trading at about $3,500 apiece before the split. The split pushed the price down to about $70. Berkshire B shares hit an all-time high on Wednesday and now trade for around $127.

Tech stock trader Sean Udall reminded me via Twitter that Chinese search engine Baidu (BIDU) did a 10-1 stock split a few years ago as well.

Baidu was trading around $70 immediately following the split. The shares have more than doubled since then.

Now there are some reasons to question why Apple is doing the split now. The stock isn't as pricey as it used to be. One could argue (with that perfect 20/20 hindsight of course) that a split would have made more sense back in 2012 when shares were trading at their all-time high -- above $705.

One theory is that Apple is just angling to finally get added to the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Apple, despite being the most valuable company in the U.S., is not in that venerable index. And it's mainly a function of its stock price.

The Dow, unlike the S&P 500, is price-weighted. So adding Apple to the Dow with a price above $550 would mean that Apple would have an inordinately large impact on the average. The split solves that problem. Apple, barring a remarkable surge back to its record peak in the next month, would have a price in the double digits once it splits.

And even if Apple did get back to above $700 (i.e. more than $100 post-split) that would not be a problem for the Dow either. There are currently 8 other Dow stocks with a price above the century mark. Goldman Sachs (GS) and Visa (V) -- two of the Dow's most recent additions -- trade for more than $160 and $209, respectively.

Related: Why is Apple splitting 7 for 1?

It's also worth nothing that there are numerous brand name stocks with triple-digit (and even four-digit) share prices that are not having problems attracting buyers.

Tesla (TSLA) trades for more than $200 a share and the stock has continued to soar, gaining nearly 40% in 2014. Netflix (NFLX) and Amazon (AMZN) both have prices above $300 and are up substantially over the past 12 months. Shares of Chipotle (CMG) trade for more than $500. The stock is up more than 40% in the past year.

And then there's Priceline (PCLN). The stock has a price above $1,200. You might think that the company should get Priceline Negotiator William Shatner to zap the price lower with a stock split. But why? The stock has soared 75% in the past year!

So Apple may be doing a smart thing to get its stock price to a more manageable level for average investors who don't want to spend more for an Apple share than they do on an iPhone 5S or iPod Air.

But if Apple was still reporting strong revenue growth and wowing investors with innovative new gadgets, then nobody would care that the stock price was in the triple digits. The sad reality for Apple is that an iSplit is about as exciting as things can get for Wall Street as investors wait for the company to finally release a truly new product.

Reader Comment of the Week! It's good to be back after a little "staycation." I missed the opportunity to serve my daily dose of snark and see what readers volleyed back in return. (Anyone for tennis? Wouldn't that be nice? First person to name the band behind that song lyric over on Twitter will get a shout-out in Tuesday's column.)

Anyhoo, one of the things I did a fair amount of with Buzz, Jr. while I was out was watch some movies. He's currently obsessed with "The Incredibles." He also likes "Frozen."

That inspired me to tweet that Disney (DIS) should do a mash-up for the two featuring Samuel L. Jackson's ice king. I'm not the first to suggest this ... as my Reader Comment of The Week hilariously points out.

Love it. Olaf! Where is my super suit?

  • 7 lucky tech stock bargains. Yes, they exist

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

    Tech stocks have been a bit of a whirling dervish lately. And the Nasdaq was getting taken to the proverbial woodshed again Thursday.

    But repeat after me. This is not 2000! Tech stocks, writ large, are MORE

    - Apr 10, 2014 2:40 PM ET
  • Carl Icahn is a pirate

    By Lee Munson

    Carl Icahn is trying to portray himself as a shareholder activist. His Twitter profile page makes him look like a cross between a wise, old grandpa ready to help Main Street investors and "The Most Interesting Man in the World" from those Dos Equis ads.

    But he's still a pirate and corporate raider. Just look at his recent attacks on eBay (EBAY).

    Icahn wants the online auction company to spin MORE

    Mar 11, 2014 7:30 AM ET
  • Microsoft CEO should be ...

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

    Microsoft is still searching for a new CEO to replace Steve Ballmer. But I have a suggestion. Hire Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen.

    I'm a bit surprised that Narayen's name hasn't been mentioned at all.

    For one, Adobe MORE

    - Jan 23, 2014 2:08 PM ET
  • Apple must fight back against Google

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

    Google has stolen all of Apple's thunder and Apple needs to try and reclaim some of it.

    During the past few years, Google (GOOG) has become the most innovative company in the tech industry. It has MORE

    - Jan 14, 2014 12:29 PM ET
  • Stocks: 2013 is one for the record books.

    Here's a fun fact: The stock market, as measured by the S&P 500 (SPX), had its strongest performance this year since the Wolf of Wall Street roamed lower Manhattan.

    The broad market gauge has gained 29.6% in 2013, its biggest jump since 1997 -- the year before Jordan Belfort, the hard-partying founder of brokerage firm Stratton Oakmont, was indicted for securities fraud and money laundering.

    Belfort, who served nearly two years in MORE

    - Dec 31, 2013 7:22 AM ET
  • The 2013 Nasdaq is nothing like 2000

    It's been a banner year for stocks. The Dow and S&P 500 have been in record territory since March, while the Nasdaq has been trading at its highest levels since 2000.

    Though the robust gains have ignited some worries that stocks may be overvalued, most experts believe that a dose of skepticism is actually healthy and predict that stocks will continue to rise next year, albeit at a more MORE

    - Dec 22, 2013 9:00 AM ET
  • BlackBerry: Not dead yet! Seriously

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

    BlackBerry, the smartphone maker formerly known as (Prince?) Research in Motion, is having a terrible 2013.

    Okay. I'm sugarcoating the situation by merely referring to this year as terrible. It's been horrific. Deplorable. Ghastly. MORE

    - Dec 10, 2013 4:04 PM ET
  • Apple has its mojo back

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

    The battle between iBulls and iBears over the direction of Apple's stock has been fascinating to watch this year.

    For most of 2013, the animals of the more ursine variety were trouncing their taurine rivals. But MORE

    - Dec 4, 2013 12:41 PM ET
  • Will Google soon pass Exxon in market value?

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.

    Google's CEO wasn't the subject of an Academy Award-nominated movie. Google's CEO also didn't strike a pose for Vogue. (Thank goodness for that!)

    Larry Page seems like a pretty boring guy. I've listened to many Google MORE

    - Nov 26, 2013 1:01 PM ET
Fear & Greed
Sponsored by

To view my watchlist

Not a member yet?

Sign up now for a free account
Stupid Stock Move of the Day
#StupidStock Move of the Day! Yes, $UA is big momo stock. And it's off lows of day. But still not sure why it's down this much on strong #s.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.